Saber 23 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Devs can you add a new Skin = Dual Crossbows :yahoo: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shitzo 37 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 :facepalm: Might aswell just give Rangers a skill that kills anything in one hit and change the game's name to Wararrow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darklock 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 idea good but only if they decrease damage and the size of the crossbow. like 1h sword but 1h crossbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Healex 1 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 idea good but only if they decrease damage and the size of the crossbow. like 1h sword but 1h crossbow Yes i agree,we dont want 600+dmg in one hit :wacko: Then it would be full server of rangers with duel crossbows. P.S. Where is the "no" option? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azebu 92 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 While dual xbows sound cool as hell, you must imagine how HARD it's to reload 2 xbows at once. Anyway, if it will allow rangers to wear shields, then maybe. I really hate people who think "dual wield > shield". Actually, the only time dual wielding is viable, is when you are Rogue, and use your off-hand for parrying, or when you dual-wield shields. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainbowZ 1 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 :facepalm: Might aswell just give Rangers a skill that kills anything in one hit and change the game's name to Wararrow Powerful shot ---> Warspear, cold black docks , bundlefield 3 (and 4) and internet in general = dead :drinks: Anyway, except for the joke, I think that it may be a cool thing, but just with half of the normal dmg. So basically would be just more an esthetic thing (or maybe with some differences in stats like lower acc and bit more faster) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MR X 2 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Yes i agree,we dont want 600+dmg in one hit :wacko: Then it would be full server of rangers with duel crossbows. P.S. Where is the "no" option? In real logic, crossbow is more painful than bow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masamune 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 make ranger can equip dual gun (akimbo) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qyo 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 In real logic, crossbow is more painful than bow. yeah, agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Healex 1 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 In real logic, crossbow is more painful than bow. I might disagree you get hit with the same arrow.And in real life crossbow is for closer shots,and bow for long ones :blush: . P.S. You ever tried shooting a bow or an xbow in real life???(It's great experience especially with crossbow ;)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darksoul II 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 make ranger can equip dual gun (akimbo) nty, ♥♥♥♥ modern weapons, this is the medieval ages, remember? O:-) dual crossbows would be cool to have implemented in-game, but it is unnecessary to add them in-game tbh. You see, rangers can wield both bows and crossbows, bds/rogues can wear swords and daggers, paladins/barbarians can both wear 2h axes, 1h axes, (maybe weapons and swords). While we, poor casters, have only one weapon of choice. :sorry: We poor wizards are forced to wield those nasty, slow, huge staves. If they were to add any new weapons in game it would have to be wands. low dmg but fast speed (they should be able to wear magical shields though) :bomb: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azebu 92 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 I might disagree you get hit with the same arrow.And in real life crossbow is for closer shots,and bow for long ones :blush: . P.S. You ever tried shooting a bow or an xbow in real life???(It's great experience especially with crossbow ;)) Nah man.Do you know when the age of steel armor ended? When they introduced crossbows. It was designed to pierce armor. Because bow couldn't. I think you were playing with toy crossbow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darklock 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (fail picture) just like lvl 12 1h sword but slower speed. + offhand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midgeedoo 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 nty, ♥♥♥♥ modern weapons, this is the medieval ages, remember? O:-) dual crossbows would be cool to have implemented in-game, but it is unnecessary to add them in-game tbh. You see, rangers can wield both bows and crossbows, bds/rogues can wear swords and daggers, paladins/barbarians can both wear 2h axes, 1h axes, (maybe weapons and swords). While we, poor casters, have only one weapon of choice. :sorry: We poor wizards are forced to wield those nasty, slow, huge staves. If they were to add any new weapons in game it would have to be wands. low dmg but fast speed (they should be able to wear magical shields though) :bomb: caster one hand staff one hand book heheh,if thats happen devs must make one hand staff with fast attack speed but low magic :wacko: opopopop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azebu 92 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (fail picture) just like lvl 12 1h sword but slower speed. + offhand >parry on crossbow;_; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yasirnoor21 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 nty, ♥♥♥♥ modern weapons, this is the medieval ages, remember? O:-) dual crossbows would be cool to have implemented in-game, but it is unnecessary to add them in-game tbh. You see, rangers can wield both bows and crossbows, bds/rogues can wear swords and daggers, paladins/barbarians can both wear 2h axes, 1h axes, (maybe weapons and swords). While we, poor casters, have only one weapon of choice. :sorry: We poor wizards are forced to wield those nasty, slow, huge staves. If they were to add any new weapons in game it would have to be wands. low dmg but fast speed (they should be able to wear magical shields though) :bomb: here is a hug brother , i feel you ;_; we all feel you :' ( we want 1h wand with magical shield and we want NOW ]: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogalik 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 >parry on crossbow ;_; Maybe some block, hm?I think that rangers can have bow + shield now. Bro this is ranger, he use only 2handed weapons , sorry :mega_shok: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masamune 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 nty, ♥♥♥♥ modern weapons, this is the medieval ages, remember? O:-) dual crossbows would be cool to have implemented in-game, but it is unnecessary to add them in-game tbh. You see, rangers can wield both bows and crossbows, bds/rogues can wear swords and daggers, paladins/barbarians can both wear 2h axes, 1h axes, (maybe weapons and swords). While we, poor casters, have only one weapon of choice. :sorry: We poor wizards are forced to wield those nasty, slow, huge staves. If they were to add any new weapons in game it would have to be wands. low dmg but fast speed (they should be able to wear magical shields though) :bomb: Haha i was joking :* A Rocket launcher will be a good replacement to those lame staff thought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megadethbr 3 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 What about Slingshot :lol: :lol: :lol: lowest damage in game but 1.5 or lower speed :wacko: :wacko: :tease: :tease: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STARR 0 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Nah remove 'Powerful shot' and place 'boomerang' twice damage also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 fuuuuuck thaaaaaaat maybe just for looks like a duel crossbow skin but really duel crossbows is overkill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General 0 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 2 crossbows?? :wacko: ...no man is very strong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melfice 21 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 2x xbow not bad but,then manyother weapons must change like necro staff and talisman skull staff for dark skull for astral or skull for dark gives more road of bulid char.But best be dual shield :yahoo: then shield reflect dmg :yahoo: or spikked shield for gmg ,big dmg but very slow ,also 7k def ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 2x xbow not bad but,then manyother weapons must change like necro staff and talisman skull staff for dark skull for astral or skull for dark gives more road of bulid char.But best be dual shield :yahoo: then shield reflect dmg :yahoo: or spikked shield for gmg ,big dmg but very slow ,also 7k def ;D Duel Shield sounds fun ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja Owl 210 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Let's give warlocks dual staffs too :dirol: :facepalm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainbowZ 1 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Let's give warlocks dual staffs too :dirol: :facepalm: Or let's give staffs DUAL WARLOCKS :shok: :shok: :shok: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Or let's give staffs DUAL WARLOCKS :shok: :shok: :shok: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REAPER 110 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 too lazy to read all the posts :blush: and as i sayed i would quit paladin if my ranger could use dual crossbows. but why not? the 2nd could have 40-60% lower dmg like its with swords/daggers. i think it should be added. and about the spell casters, they could use a magic sword with shied or magic book like in other games. faster but weaker. this game needs improvements so lets not make fun of new ideas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darklock 0 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 >parry on crossbow ;_; u want atk speed and crit? ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saber 23 Posted April 3, 2013 Author Share Posted April 3, 2013 well dual crossbows deal small damage because its small unlike 2 handed crossbows deals damage bigger so dual isnt deadly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 too lazy to read all the posts :blush: and as i sayed i would quit paladin if my ranger could use dual crossbows. but why not? the 2nd could have 40-60% lower dmg like its with swords/daggers. i think it should be added. and about the spell casters, they could use a magic sword with shied or magic book like in other games. faster but weaker. this game needs improvements so lets not make fun of new ideas. I always thought it would be cool if there was something sharp at the bottom of my staff, so when mele's get close i could do a little damage, If i was a caster in RL I'd always have brass knuckles or a switchblade on me for this reason. I'm sure if we all worked on idea's witht he devs we could figure something out that would keep us balanced and add a lil something to our weapons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REAPER 110 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 I always thought it would be cool if there was something sharp at the bottom of my staff, so when mele's get close i could do a little damage, If i was a caster in RL I'd always have brass knuckles or a switchblade on me for this reason. I'm sure if we all worked on idea's witht he devs we could figure something out that would keep us balanced and add a lil something to our weapons about that, i had in mind a skill for druids name bear or true form that could make the druids do melee physical increased dmg. im sure it could work for mcs/forsaken/chosen too. (puma/wolf/lion) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 about that, i had in mind a skill for druids name bear or true form that could make the druids do melee physical increased dmg. im sure it could work for mcs/forsaken/chosen too. (puma/wolf/lion) agreed, after all druids are shapeshifters and i think to even it out shaman could maybe transform the enemy, or transform barb/dk to increase their intimidation skills Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saber 23 Posted April 3, 2013 Author Share Posted April 3, 2013 agreed, after all druids are shapeshifters and i think to even it out shaman could maybe transform the enemy, or transform barb/dk to increase their intimidation skills DRUID IS THE MOST weakest class in game and the pal :facepalm: why druid has the most worst spells entangle roots with no damage and bees? bees cause venom not slow enemies lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 DRUID IS THE MOST weakest class in game and the pal :facepalm: why druid has the most worst spells entangle roots with no damage and bees? bees cause venom not slow enemies lmao I disagree druid has higher max attack and max heal to balance out the stun spells shaman have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saber 23 Posted April 3, 2013 Author Share Posted April 3, 2013 I disagree druid has higher max attack and max heal to balance out the stun spells shaman have ok i always hate druids Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 ok i always hate druids lol me too bro, me too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REAPER 110 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 i have both shaman and druid and i think they equal. yes shamans have blind while druids suck balls, yes shamans have quack while druids suck balls again, but shamans most times max attack skills and not heal. and druid always go lighting, heal and root/bees. like there are not other skills :facepalm: my druid on 14lvl do 800dmg lighting cause i have arena build. so please.... druids are not the weakest. its about the tactic and the build someone use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlboobootheGenieoftheLamp 0 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 i have both shaman and druid and i think they equal. yes shamans have blind while druids suck balls, yes shamans have quack while druids suck balls again, but shamans most times max attack skills and not heal. and druid always go lighting, heal and root/bees. like there are not other skills :facepalm: my druid on 14lvl do 800dmg lighting cause i have arena build. so please.... druids are not the weakest. its about the tactic and the build someone use. exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueborn 21 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Next rangers will ask for Then... Then... Then they will expect this... :crazy: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.