adywijaya 70 Posted June 11, 2014 Posted June 11, 2014 i just wanna ask how if in the future rogue available using heavy armor ? how your opinion guys. its make sense since dev love so much with mo**y and last update they gave us a axe. its still possible right, whos know ? so how about that guys, please dont bully :drinks:
adywijaya 70 Posted June 11, 2014 Author Posted June 11, 2014 hehe why ? :spiteful: elves must be so afraid :blush:
Mecha 118 Posted June 11, 2014 Posted June 11, 2014 so rangers should get heavy armors too? I wonder how the other 10 classes will feel about this?
Hinatayank 0 Posted June 11, 2014 Posted June 11, 2014 if rogue can use heavy armor, wlock can use bow :pleasantry:
GEGATA 0 Posted June 12, 2014 Posted June 12, 2014 Rogue with heavy armor is better than BD.... GM will never do that :D
curiousguy 8 Posted June 16, 2014 Posted June 16, 2014 Rogue with heavy armor I'm on it, well shaman/druid will be dual wielding staves
barge 0 Posted June 16, 2014 Posted June 16, 2014 i like it, but just like any D&D games where wearing heavy armor significantly increases the difficulty in making a successful hide attempt, the skill stealth would also be disabled. i mean think about it: how could a plate armor wearing rogue with all those metal parts which produces a full array of clanky sounds ever get someone to not notice him when he tries to hide? thanks
zaibax 12 Posted June 16, 2014 Posted June 16, 2014 Rogues could be overpowered... but im rogue, so i like it! xD
SRBgamer 0 Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Nope. Rogue need extreme crit when he use stealth bb target 8) 8) 8)
Deltaman 4 Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 I'm with you. If barbs can dual wield 2h weapons. Seems fair, right?
Megadethbr 3 Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Worst idea ever imo....soon any class will use any weapon and any set gear :bad: :bad:
Recommended Posts