Steelblade - BR Tourmaline

[Steelblade-TU 4]

When Hunter Kenneth chose his cursed train-car to surf between doomed stations, Chucky appeared as an unexpected agent of chaos — a small dog who, amidst the event, wears the terrifying mask of Chucky, wielding a bloodstained toy knife, laughing at sentinels and legionnaires who dare to enter the heart of Nightmare Town.

Chucky — once just an innocent dog playing in the shadow of pumpkins — was possessed by a malevolent spark released from Kenneth’s cursed rails. Now, he roams the dark corridors of the ghostly city, seeking revenge on the heroes of Arinar who struggle to stop Hunter Kenneth’s plan.

The players’ mission: stop the train, face the boss Hunter Kenneth, and defeat Chucky before his sinister laughter spreads throughout Nightmare Town. Only united will they be able to prevent the rails of darkness from becoming the stage for this demonic dog’s bloody comedy.

[Brutalist 141]

There are a few points I’d like to highlight:

 

First and most obvious, the Warspear logo was generated by AI, which makes no sense since you could’ve just used one of the existing ones available online.

 

On the fireplace, there seems to be a screen reflecting what’s behind the photo, and we can see that no one is actually taking the picture.

 

If you look closely, you’ll notice that the white light cables disappear.

 

The knife is practically floating, the position it’s in makes it hard to imagine it’s part of the costume.

 

You can see some irregularities in the colored lines of the costume.

 

Although the picture quality is acceptable, the candy brand is almost unrecognizable.

 

The reflection of the white lights on some parts of the wood looks wrong.

 

The fact that you sent such a staged photo and that the text was clearly generated by AI only increases my suspicions 

[Steelblade-TU 4]

23 horas atrás, Brutalist disse:

There are a few points I’d like to highlight:

 

First and most obvious, the Warspear logo was generated by AI, which makes no sense since you could’ve just used one of the existing ones available online.

 

On the fireplace, there seems to be a screen reflecting what’s behind the photo, and we can see that no one is actually taking the picture.

 

If you look closely, you’ll notice that the white light cables disappear.

 

The knife is practically floating, the position it’s in makes it hard to imagine it’s part of the costume.

 

You can see some irregularities in the colored lines of the costume.

 

Although the picture quality is acceptable, the candy brand is almost unrecognizable.

 

The reflection of the white lights on some parts of the wood looks wrong.

 

The fact that you sent such a staged photo and that the text was clearly generated by AI only increases my suspicions 

Well, my friend, the funny thing is that maybe you could try working for the FBI, but I don’t think you’d get the job, right? About the first point, the logo: if you don’t have a printer at home, there’s nothing I can do about the quality. As for the fireplace, the fact that no one appears in the reflection is obviously because I didn’t want to appear. My camera has an automatic timer option where I can select how many seconds before it takes the photo, okay? I don’t know what world you live in, but I guess it’s the one where you can’t do better and have to rely on other people’s work. The white light cables disappear because the picture has an aged filter; if you zoom in, you’ll see the quality isn’t perfect. The knife isn’t floating, it’s attached with a line both to the board and to the outfit. As for the candy brand, does it really need to show? I can’t just put a piece of plastic or something like that to make it “look nicer”? And honestly, if you can’t make something similar, there’s no need to be jealous of other people’s work.

Oh and to add the text you said bad things about isn’t even necessary I put it there because I wanted to just to have a connection with the story just so you’re more aware of that but there’s still time with the time you spent writing all this you could go buy a costume for your dog or even make one it’s cheap decorate it with some simple stuff and take a picture then you’d see if you can actually compete instead of just criticizing or better yet take that image and run it through an AI tool and ask if it’s AI generated because I actually did that right now funny thing is the AI itself said it wasn’t you can even try it on ChatGPT and see so my friend good luck hope you get better because I think you need to maybe then you’ll stop trying to criticize other people’s work and actually do your own

[Brutalist 141]

20 hours ago, Steelblade-TU said:

Well, my friend, the funny thing is that maybe you could try working for the FBI, but I don’t think you’d get the job, right?

I think this was unnecessary. 

 

20 hours ago, Steelblade-TU said:

About the first point, the logo: if you don’t have a printer at home, there’s nothing I can do about the quality.

What do you mean? So you asked the AI to generate the image?

 

21 hours ago, Steelblade-TU said:

As for the fireplace, the fact that no one appears in the reflection is obviously because I didn’t want to appear. My camera has an automatic timer option where I can select how many seconds before it takes the photo, okay? The white light cables disappear because the picture has an aged filter; if you zoom in, you’ll see the quality isn’t perfect. The knife isn’t floating, it’s attached with a line both to the board and to the outfit. As for the candy brand, does it really need to show? I can’t just put a piece of plastic or something like that to make it “look nicer”? And honestly, if you can’t make something similar, there’s no need to be jealous of other people’s work.

 

You could have avoided all this text with mediocre arguments by sending a photo that proves it's real. After all, you are the owner of what appears in the image. 

 

21 hours ago, Steelblade-TU said:

if you can’t make something similar, there’s no need to be jealous of other people’s work.

 

I can't feel envy for something that doesn't exist.  

 

21 hours ago, Steelblade-TU said:

just criticizing

I'm just exposing you as the liar you are to prevent more people from falling into your trap. Come on, admit you're a liar and avoid public humiliation

 

21 hours ago, Steelblade-TU said:

or better yet take that image and run it through an AI tool and ask if it’s AI generated because I actually did that right now funny thing is the AI itself said it wasn’t you can even try it on ChatGPT and see so my friend good luck hope you get better because I think you need to maybe then you’ll stop trying to criticize other people’s work and actually do your own

If your argument for defending the photo's authenticity is to use another AI, then you're the one who needs to improve, not me. 

And you forgot to explain why some white lights reflected on wood look unnatural, but I don't think you noticed. 

Why did you get so aggressive when you could have shut me up by sending a single photo proving it's real? You're literally defending something that doesn't exist. 

[Mikasi 20]

1 hour ago, Brutalist disse:

I think this was unnecessary. 

 

What do you mean? So you asked the AI to generate the image?

 

You could have avoided all this text with mediocre arguments by sending a photo that proves it's real. After all, you are the owner of what appears in the image. 

 

I can't feel envy for something that doesn't exist.  

 

I'm just exposing you as the liar you are to prevent more people from falling into your trap. Come on, admit you're a liar and avoid public humiliation

 

If your argument for defending the photo's authenticity is to use another AI, then you're the one who needs to improve, not me. 

And you forgot to explain why some white lights reflected on wood look unnatural, but I don't think you noticed. 

Why did you get so aggressive when you could have shut me up by sending a single photo proving it's real? You're literally defending something that doesn't exist. 

I’ve been observing the Brutalist profile, and it’s clear that he shows a typical hater behavior, constantly criticizing posts, complaining about everything, and always finding something negative to point out. Just follow the threads he participates in, it’s a recurring pattern.
Honestly, I think he could even consider seeking some psychological support, because the work presented here turned out excellent, and it’s clearly not made by artificial intelligence.
What really draws my attention is this, the point to which a person gets to the point of needing to be advised to seek professional help, given how persistent he is in criticizing everything and everyone. It seems to come from within, from some inner issue he carries and takes out on others.

[Mixver 340]

It’s amazing how every time there are a couple of naive contest participants who think they can fool everyone with a cheap AI-generated image and text

And they never forget to get offended every time they’re caught as if that would fix anything

[Mikasi 20]

1 hora atrás, Brutalist disse:

I think this was unnecessary. 

 

What do you mean? So you asked the AI to generate the image?

 

You could have avoided all this text with mediocre arguments by sending a photo that proves it's real. After all, you are the owner of what appears in the image. 

 

I can't feel envy for something that doesn't exist.  

 

I'm just exposing you as the liar you are to prevent more people from falling into your trap. Come on, admit you're a liar and avoid public humiliation

 

If your argument for defending the photo's authenticity is to use another AI, then you're the one who needs to improve, not me. 

And you forgot to explain why some white lights reflected on wood look unnatural, but I don't think you noticed. 

Why did you get so aggressive when you could have shut me up by sending a single photo proving it's real? You're literally defending something that doesn't exist. 

I would like to add, in relation to my previous observation, the profile photo of Brutalist, which resembles the typical profiles of haters, people who often like to draw attention, even if in a negative way. This is his case: both the photo and most of the comments he makes in this forum follow the same pattern of criticism and negativity, which seem to be the only forms of expression he is capable of offering, perhaps due to some internal trauma or an unachieved goal… no one knows. Only a medical consultation could determine what his problem really is.

In addition, among the points he raised, as is common in hater profiles, he failed to mention essential and noticeable aspects of the image, such as the slight disorganization of the cups to the left on the small table, the reflection of hanging objects—which he himself mentions—the scratches on the floor, among other details.

It is also worth emphasizing the previously mentioned point of view: it is a filter that ages the image and at the same time can enhance it, which does not disqualify the photo from the contest, since the rules only required that it be a photo containing an animal.

This is, therefore, a technical and impartial analysis, unlike Brutalist, who, like any typical hater, only sees the negative aspects, ignoring the elements that truly deserve attention.

[Steelblade-TU 4]

5 minutes ago, Mixver disse:

It’s amazing how every time there are a couple of naive contest participants who think they can fool everyone with a cheap AI-generated image and text

And they never forget to get offended every time they’re caught as if that would fix anything

Unfortunately, Warspear is a game that many people with certain depressive issues turn to in order to avoid the outside world. And the result of that, more often than not, is exactly this: criticizing other people’s work. It is truly tragic.

[Mikasi 20]

8 minutes ago, Mixver disse:

It’s amazing how every time there are a couple of naive contest participants who think they can fool everyone with a cheap AI-generated image and text

And they never forget to get offended every time they’re caught as if that would fix anything

This Mixver is impressive in how he manages to be a hater and criticize others across multiple languages. I think his life was made for this forum, as he participates in Russian forums, English ones, and others. You can see it from his profile. That is, if he isn’t Brutalist on the same account, since the profile is the same.

[Brutalist 141]

33 minutes ago, Mikasi said:

 if he isn’t Brutalist on the same account, since the profile is the same.

Congratulations on discovering the secret 

[Brutalist 141]

@Mikasi I don't know who you are, And I don't know why you became so aggressive with me (maybe because you have certain problems that you accuse me of).  but you're accusing me of being the worst person on the forum without any proof You say I have psychological problems, you attack me for no reason, but I'm the bad guy, right?

That's called an ad hominem fallacy You attack me but you don't respond to the argument. 

Clearly, arguments like "my avatar reflects some kind of behavior" are something only an AI would say. 

I hope people see what kind of bad person you are 

[Shimarin 1908]

I'm sorry, the evidence is against the OP. 

This work is disqualified