jorge 4 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 leader passing is unfair , could u make it a temporary leader for a while till real leader back or second leader that can be chosed by main leader in case of UN activity , so leader I'll chose someone whom trust in his hard job developing the guild , it's unfair , I guess u declaring war against u , "guilds leaders > most addicted players > most of your income " , and why not someone evil destroy the devils ! get on other side join your enemy clan , play hard till the leader be busy with school exams or job and so on everyone have a life ... and when u be a leader kick them all out , mission done . , think twice sir , u bringing troubles , and sorry for bad English and the long post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corona virus 230 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Yes, because its that god damn hard for the leader to log on just 1 time in 2 weeks. The 5 seconds taken to log on in a 1,209,600 second time frame is too much work, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
absalom 54 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 The lead change doesnt bother me. Its probably good for a lot of noobie guilds that arent that active. Sad to think, but if I die today on the way home from work It would suck for my guild if the lead got stuck on my char. At least now they only would have to wait 2 weeks. So now if you really want leader of your guild just kill off the other members and wait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VrockS 2 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 At least let leader choose to whom the lead will be passed if he/she is inactive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x 52 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 At least let leader choose to whom the lead will be passed if he/she is inactive? This is what devs are trying to prevent bro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0land 1096 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 It's kinda strange if you're the leader of the guild and can't login during the two weeks term. And also don't have an honest heir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCocktail 183 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) It's kinda strange if you're the leader of the guild and can't login during the two weeks term. And also don't have an honest heir.An honest Heir is worth a ruined minister, because the leader transaction is able to go to newbies too. Also, yes you might have issues far more important than the game, but the moment you get back in you are going to have a bad time. Even if there were far worse Edited February 24, 2015 by MCocktail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosotraes 350 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 It's kinda strange if you're the leader of the guild and can't login during the two weeks term. And also don't have an honest heir. Ever heard of an event called holiday? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corona virus 230 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Ever heard of an event called holiday? 1. If people are constantly busy on holidays they should not be leader because they cannot attend to their guild 2. Why the hell would anyone want to lead a guild if they cant even play? That's like a guy insisting that his banned char deserves lead. Its pure selfishness, anyone who is against this 2 week thing is incredibly selfish because they want to have the lead to a guild but never log on as a good leader should. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaginadare 13 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Saw someone suggest an awesome fix for this leader passing system to make it fair both ways. Something about Thane's. Either way. - leader made the guild - paid for the unity sign/s - paid for the leveling (mostly) - reason it even exists Either remove it or change the system to something better. IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosotraes 350 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Saw someone suggest an awesome fix for this leader passing system to make it fair both ways. Something about Thane's. Either way. - leader made the guild - paid for the unity sign/s - paid for the leveling (mostly) - reason it even exists Either remove it or change the system to something better. IMO. Agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corona virus 230 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Saw someone suggest an awesome fix for this leader passing system to make it fair both ways. Something about Thane's. Either way. - leader made the guild - paid for the unity sign/s - paid for the leveling (mostly) - reason it even exists Either remove it or change the system to something better. IMO. And will probably get 0 gp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rachit 7 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Saw someone suggest an awesome fix for this leader passing system to make it fair both ways. Something about Thane's. Either way. - leader made the guild - paid for the unity sign/s - paid for the leveling (mostly) - reason it even exists Either remove it or change the system to something better. IMO. Kick all the members that will be better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.