Jump to content

Why does the fire totem only target one? (Short Rant)


Malik Campbell
 Share

Recommended Posts

I remember years ago the fire totem could target multiple ppl, I just found out (via world chat in US server) that it only target's one person? Why is that??? Because some sentinels think it's "op"? Ever since I came back to the game and the forums I've seen posts asking for the nerfing of the charmer because of some relic, instead of the relic getting nerf it's the charmer, like really now? Also this joke of a post about "hunters poison arrow is too op ☺" like get out of here with that nonsense. The legion population is at an all time low but the elves seems fine I guess, I wonder why? It's not because the other side is getting nerfed to oblivion... Right?

Edited by Malik Campbell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time elfs start to "cry" they got what they want in 7 days while other side wait years for change or they dont change it at all. Last balance they nerfed mcs bcs guild on br server had specific chars with picked skills and they were beating all . Then when elf did same they started winning but mc side got nerfed even after elfs started to win. Mage blessing bug was there way too long but when it came to dk fire being abused they nerfed it same week some1 started to "cry". Now this with charmer. We waited like 2+ years for bd and seeker nerf but charmer get nerfed in 1 week . If you look at arenas elfs are more dominant since they have more support skills and aoe control(only seeker doesnt have it) . They also nerfed chief burst build and aoe build in same patch even thought its not able to do both in 1 build .  They nerfed lock aoe control even thought its only char that can do aoe control on mc side and they did nothing with templar . And after this charmer nerf its confirmed that devs favourise 1 side more than other.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Santa Claus said:

Every time elfs start to "cry" they got what they want in 7 days while other side wait years for change or they dont change it at all. Last balance they nerfed mcs bcs guild on br server had specific chars with picked skills and they were beating all . Then when elf did same they started winning but mc side got nerfed even after elfs started to win. Mage blessing bug was there way too long but when it came to dk fire being abused they nerfed it same week some1 started to "cry". Now this with charmer. We waited like 2+ years for bd and seeker nerf but charmer get nerfed in 1 week . If you look at arenas elfs are more dominant since they have more support skills and aoe control(only seeker doesnt have it) . They also nerfed chief burst build and aoe build in same patch even thought its not able to do both in 1 build .  They nerfed lock aoe control even thought its only char that can do aoe control on mc side and they did nothing with templar . And after this charmer nerf its confirmed that devs favourise 1 side more than other.

 

Based on what you said here I'm starting to think they truly favour one side over the other. Does any of the devs play the game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Malik Campbell said:

Does any of the devs play the game?

 

They don't need to, since they check statistics of the game. This is their source of infos related to the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Santa Claus said:

Every time elfs start to "cry" they got what they want in 7 days while other side wait years for change or they dont change it at all. Last balance they nerfed mcs bcs guild on br server had specific chars with picked skills and they were beating all . Then when elf did same they started winning but mc side got nerfed even after elfs started to win. Mage blessing bug was there way too long but when it came to dk fire being abused they nerfed it same week some1 started to "cry". Now this with charmer. We waited like 2+ years for bd and seeker nerf but charmer get nerfed in 1 week . If you look at arenas elfs are more dominant since they have more support skills and aoe control(only seeker doesnt have it) . They also nerfed chief burst build and aoe build in same patch even thought its not able to do both in 1 build .  They nerfed lock aoe control even thought its only char that can do aoe control on mc side and they did nothing with templar . And after this charmer nerf its confirmed that devs favourise 1 side more than other.

 

elfs are good in arena, MCs are better in gvg/group fights.

 

Spoiler

"This looks like 1 server problem:sadowl:"

 

Edited by Babocool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mcs "were" better bcs they were focused mainly on shaman lock and chief. If u compare those  classes only shaman remain same in gvg after last skill balance . While elfs remained same . There are many videos on how that guild from br started  losing even be4 skill balance . And now its even worse

And in arena its pointless to discuss about fairness bcs mcs are left with 2 good chars for arena shaman and barb while elfs got way more 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...