Jump to content

x

Members
  • Posts

    3422
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by x

  1. You mean in term dungeon because of single damage, but actually it is np. That day I was going to make a 1 stam with my pt in term heroic just if one of our members didn't dc when the boss was 100k hp, and I am a druid btw. It is not a big problem, but u can wait,there will be new expert skills.
  2. We needed years until they implement a fighting-ally sys, and in the end they didn't create it in the purpose of pvping, but we can use it in a pvping way. So the best way is to go to a closed place between you and your friend and do your pvp. Otherwise, I think they won't implement it, and please forget the prizes idea...
  3. Yes, let devs design some awesome logos for guilds. More fancy logos can be bought from the miracle shop. One of the ways to make a guild's logo appear is when a paladin uses his banner, his guild's logo could appear on the banner. Another way is when using the new lvl 7 active skill "Guild Totem", the guild's logo could appear on the totem. Feel free to ask/quibble/give ideas. Thank you!
  4. That is mine suggestion too, I agree on lallous's one.
  5. It has been suggested and I say no because the game mechanics are like that. Imagine a 30 magic increase for a level 30 caster in the future, it would change many of his skills.
  6. 270g is ok, but not bad if 400g turned into 300g.
  7. I didn't like it since the 1st time, sorry. And how do u want the sys to differentiate between the druids' 2 self-healing skills?
  8. I like this. Yes, when? Thanks Shilan & thanks for reading!
  9. Not a bad new dung idea, but as for the 2nd+ bosses, each dung in ws is made in a way for a 1 stam finish for all of its stages, so even if the dung made, it should be made for a 1 stam finish in all of its stages.
  10. Magic items for tank classes are made well, if there should be any change, devs would do it right away.
  11. x

    LOCAL PVP SERVER

    Servers for a special purpose are surely not allowed in warspear and won't be implemented.
  12. Have been suggested a lot, but no answers for it, so maybe they won't ever. I agree anyways.
  13. No, upgrade sys is better for defensive equipment and re-forge should be left for offensive equipment.
  14. Your ideas have been suggested before, I have np with the 1st, but please explain the 2nd. No for the 3rd. The 4th will be implemented in the next update for sure because Peter said they forgot it and they may implement it in the next updates.
  15. Not bad if they implemented it, I have np. It would be a nice that when getting a weapon, it gives u a chance of getting another upgraded version of it.
×
×
  • Create New...