Jump to content

vavavi

Guardian of Spear
  • Posts

    584
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by vavavi

  1. Tbh it´s alot easier now to upgrade your character without spending alot. With alot of high gold and fast to do quests, constant dg events etc. All you need to do is get to a high lvl, join a somewhat active guild, and it´s mostly a matter of time until you score some big drop from dg and snowball from that; better gears, more dg invs, more drops etc. And not to forget you can get really lucky and score a book drop that can instantly pay for basically full upgrades for your character. The games moved alot to a better direction for free to play people over the last couple years. Main thing I´d suggest is trying to seek out an active guild, daily events alone are a pretty decent source of income, with the said chance of big ticket items being dropped.

  2. On 4/6/2023 at 3:17 PM, Jojorabbit said:

    In fact, if the development team updates the matching system to use in the arena, all problems will be solved.

     

    Idea "Ignore It's" just the 3rd thought of the entire problem to help developers save time doing something to prevent it, such as getting an offending account ban report.

     

    Nowadays, the Arena ticketing business is still generating profits.  Can you justify the current situation and imagine that the game WarspearOnline has a matching system Installed?

     

    On 4/7/2023 at 12:05 AM, Ryohei said:

    In fact it would be a very good idea, not to have any kind of contact with those people such as wchat/private chat/area chat/pt inv/trade inv/ and now on arenas

    Putting people on ignore to avoid any competition is ridiculous.

  3. 1 hour ago, SaltyCoffe said:

    I mean in a certain point of view having this " unbinded books " with 50% of their original buff could be cool and could help lower the "real" book prices a bit. For example looking right now in EU-elf the demand is crazy and people paying a lot for simple books

     

    Example ( as it could help lower these books prices ) 

    2 years ago I dropped rampant attack during spring ( i was still with nub gear ) and i had to sell it for 900k ish because noone was buying it as rampant was a super high drop rate and not everyone had the money

    1 year ago i heard it was 5m ish ( i wasn't playing ) 

    This spring i heard the only rampant dropped for now got sold for 11m+

    I mean yeah prices change , people get more money ok, but it's not really "new player friendly", or even for normal players who don't spend a lot on mcoins, having a book that goes 10x price in just 2 years:t6:

    Rampant was 2m ish last year at eu elf atleast. You're probably being lied to. But yea alot of books have insanely high prices, having these weaker versions would make them more accessible, and wouldn't devalue normal ones. 

  4. On 3/30/2023 at 11:42 AM, SaltyCoffe said:

    I 99% agree with this ;

    my only point is that : with this way that the guy described it would be less "abusable" because it's 1 book per year, a lot of things change and it could help to change class and have more fun with another . If sea books is what makes you think that it's too OP , maybe we could get this idea to work but with just normal books 

    Kinda complicated and strange but could be an idea. For example, a simple mana book or a health book , this shouldn't be that "game change abuse"

    What do you think 

    If the suggestion is 1 book per year, the topic should be called "i used a sea book on a bad class". Would be pointless for any other books at that point. 

     

    One idea could be to sort of downgrade the book if they got unbound. Kind of like you lose amps and break the item when unbinding a piece of equipment. For example, having the effect of books get halved by that process. It would still allow people who truly want to get something out of their books to do it, but wouldn't be abusable. It would also give new players access to these cheaper, weaker versions of books.

  5. This would firstly be way too abusable, especially with sea books. Those books are already borderline game breaking, and should be toned down harshly, but atleast they're rare. Being able to pass a single one around to every possible class, depending which one of them just happens to be the best after any given balance change, is way too powerful.

     

    Outside of that, having this possibility would completely devalue the time, effort and money that people have put in to building a character. Currently fully booked chars are usually stand out cases, they're still somewhat rare, and are something to strive for. They're something that put you a step above the rest. The game needs to have something like this, for there to be actual end game goals.

    If this got implemented, those end game goals would be kind of gone. Owning a single set of books would mean you can have one of these rare, stand out chars for every single class available to your faction, making them alot less special, or unique. Instead of them being this end game peak to work towards, it would just become the standard for any character, even possible new classes (Kind of like how arena getting easier over time turned awarded chars from rare, stand out cases into a minimum standard to even be able to compete)

     

    As for the newbie friendliness, i don't think this would make those books more accessible for new/returning people. With unbinding being there, suddenly every single book is useful. For example, caster players might not feel the need to get a speed book right now, since it doesn't do much for them. But if this made its way into the game, that book is now a permanent, transferrable asset to any class you might happen to switch to at any point, making them even more desirable and driving the price even higher.

     

  6. Spoiler
    10 hours ago, beto said:

    Actually if u die the proble is u, cause at my server seekers comes invisible to attack u and stun u and cant do anything, and if i resist the stun and try to attack is too late cause my hp already low wirh their fast auto atatck cant dk any, so if u let ppl stun you is cause u dont know how tocplay ur seeker, and about ppl hit u 500 maybe u need more amp xdd

     

    First i have lvl 32 greatness and get 52 resi, how comes u have 52 resi with full lvl 28 gear? It suspicius, and u must show video where we can see what weapons and buff use seeker and you, also to see how fast they reduce ur hp with auto qttacks, this is clearly a ss just to ur convenience 

    Ok go pvp from a druid or shaman and show me how u are able to kill a seeker xdd 

     

    You can always use a detect pot, or buffs, to counter said seeker. I'm however starting to see that you probably are someone to just stand still and die to seekers without even trying anything to counter them.  Couple simple buffs or using your aoes to not let seeker catch you invisible goes a long way.

  7. Spoiler
    27 minutes ago, Santa Claus said:

    Rogues does this amount of damage onwar buffed ppl with his auto using daggers or even axes ?

     

    Seeker gain huge value out of buffs and 1v1 is not relevant as u already said. If u buff seeker with pala shield /mage resist and some other skills hes not dying . Also for example when seeker gain pala shield he also have reduced dmg on with shield  if u use talent that got perma dmg reduction

    Ur the one who said that 1v1 isnt relevant.

    And druid is one of the best 1v1 classes in the game.

    Seems like only u are smart one and only u on all servers use buffs in arena . Never tried this be4 thanks for ur advice

     

    I mean you can get annoyed all you want, but these damage numbers you're throwing around are just straight lies.

  8. 1 hour ago, beto said:

    I have shaman with 13 books and full greatnes 10% and 52% resilence, or u try ro hide how strong seekers are or ur seeker must be week.

    If you're genuinely dying to a seeker on a booked and amped shaman, i think the problem is you at that point.

     

    Also you won't get hit 1800 through full greatness, unles the seeker ur fighting is fully buffed, and you're refusing to do the same. At what point the problem is again you.

  9. Spoiler
    4 hours ago, Fynn said:

    1- yes i know im not properly geared. 

    But c'om +8 is acceptable for a middle pvp gear (45% res) 

     

    2- i never said that i've faced full greatness +10 seekers/bds, even i know that It would be very stupid to believe that I can beat someone this armed. :dunno:

     

    3- pve seekers +6 - +8 with talent working, They hit as hard as a drunken Stepfather. Even when im supposed to have advantage by having pvp gear. 

     

    4- Blade dancers are something else, In short, they care about 1 ton of s**t, how many are you amplified, they anyways clean their butts with you.:t6:

    This will never change

     

    It wouldn't hurt to have reading comprehension, I'm just saying

     

    Yea 45% resi is plenty to survive a similiarly amped seeker, maybe you're just not using the best strategies to counter them.

  10. Spoiler
    14 hours ago, Fynn said:

    You are saying that

    We need to be +10 full greatness full book full steroids to  face a simple seeker? 

     

    Well, I guess you have some reason..

     

    my chief is +8 full pvp gear, and im still being easily destroyed by seekers, even pve seekers (also bladedancers) with rugged hide on!! XD!!  Easy 1k on me... 

     

    I know im not supposed to be inmortal but c'mon...  I've lasted less than a wet noodle:fuck_that:

     

    How do you explain that? 

     

    Are you going to tell me I don't know how to play chief? :i_know_what_you_did_there:

     

    Now, i know seekers arent too overpowered, they are just.. A glass canon.. also that talent made them A tough nut to crack. 

     

     

     

    I mean, you said it yourself, you're not properly geared while most likely facing people who are. What you're doing is essentially the same as a +8 badly geared druid getting killed by a fully booked,awarded and amped rogue, and then calling them broken.

    Spoiler
    15 hours ago, Riaur said:

    Thing is that class hit +10 award casters for average 1,2-1,6k (2x +10 weap seekers) combined with their insane speed and high pene amounts (didnt get a lot of it just from skills?)makes melt any caster/light armor class in seconds ( so also at duration of stun that seeker can cast), without giving chance to react, ofc we dont talk abt scenario seeker vs bd, seeker vs any tank. Catched :lock, necro, rogue, chieftain (if not used rugged), hunter cant do anything, the problem is here, apart from the books, we are talking about dry stats of classes in the award equipment, we write it in reverse that warlock burst and glass canon build has to be nerfed but even higher burst dmg of seeker is fine, I would like to mention that to get such large amounts of mana lock sacrifices one of the most important statistics in pvp - resi, while seeker don't sacrifice anything still can have pvp gears and have that huge dmg. 

     

    1,6k on a fully awarded caster, thats just a lie. They don't even hit my lvl 28 priest that high, you're just making stuff up at this point. Also you can so easily counter seekers, just use a detect pot and a scroll that lowers auto attack dmg. Or buff up hp/resist. Or do anything else than standing still waiting to die, because thats the only way a fully amped and awarded caster would die to a seeker.

  11. On 3/11/2023 at 8:39 PM, beto said:

    What u talk is nonsense, because first warlocks skill get resisted all the time, second how we can use skills on a seeker when he will coming to u invisible?  Seekers auto attack 1800 or more with super speed, like 5 auto attack on 3 seconds its 9k dmg, but that doesnt need a nerf? 

    No proper pvp char gets hit 1800 by seekers. It's one of the worst pvp classes easily, i don't understand how people complain about them. There is no way this many people are incapable of beating a class thats only way of killing you is auto attacking at melee range.

  12. 4 hours ago, Fenrir Lappland said:

    Agree , So can you explain to me 5/5 mermaid buff heavy armor magic, bd cut him 3900 damage?

    40136b8c0a196008.jpg

    If this screenshot showed what that damage was dealt to probably could. I have a lvl 28 priest, its +9 but full resi, and even that doesnt get hit 4k vortexes. 

  13. Spoiler
    8 hours ago, Mewtwo said:

    why do you always say the same things when we post here against the elf class? what is this forum for? I did a post recently about reviewing, those updates that always disfavors the MC class, and the vices answered me almost the same thing they gave to the player who posted this video, it's no wonder that the fame of the gms is that they are elves, the rod with 15 book op arena, and you give an answer that the guy's barbarian is poorly set up, so my account is wrongly set up full +10, that of other players is wrongly set up, for love bro, give a sensible and convincing answer, elves it has always been more worked on and is appealing whether in pvp or pve, interesting and elves all have a shield and stun in the area, and then there are other classes but still stolen, it creates a character that in addition to stun still casts the guy away, they gave an animal to the summoner that hits almost the same thing as the one that invokes, I of hunter full +10, receives 1435 damage from the summoned animal while the summoner only looked at the animal at me hits, the seeker gave a talent that the cbow +10 guy has to give 10 15 hits to kill the seeker while the seeker de. dagger and that's right dagger 2 .. 3 hit kills you, ahh please ae the guy post the video for you to see, the robbery that these updates that the developers make and favor only one side, it's not normal for the guy to give 3 k + in a barbaro, the guy with 15 book 

     

    I mean the barb who posted this is using a very low resilience setup. Heavy mermen, before stacks, is paper. On top of that he is using a 2 handed weapon, with probably a more offensive than a defensive build. He would get nuked when caught by any damage class the same. Number of books doesn't change these things.

  14. 5 hours ago, Mateusz said:

    You didnt even answer to anything i said, u just copy paste his comment "swooping is not fair". 

    I wasn't answering to you, thats probably why. Nor did i say its not fair, i said its behavior is inconsistent. You, as a person who is actually answering, might want to read the comment you're answering to.

     

    5 hours ago, Mateusz said:

    You are wrong once again. I already told elfs have exactly same skill as mcs. Swooping is same as palas banner. So we dont have THE ONLY ONE aoe skill that can "stack" bro (idk why u even saying it stacks while its not, just different skill behavior mechanics). Palas banner can hit multiple targets same way as swooping. Your whole comment is just simply not true or wrong. 

    Okay, there are 2 skills that stack, theyre also very different. Swooping does dmg alot faster than banner, while reducing dodge. It's alot closer to blazing than banner in damage capability. But sure, 2 different, equally as inconsistent skills. But theres also like 6 other aoe damage skills that don't work this way.

×
×
  • Create New...