Bromancé

It was well-detailed answer thank you.
 
While I agree and understand it mostly, it still is quite unfair to the players earlier, I am more than happy times are also changing to player-friendly with no that much of aware to lose account that have been built for years, but.. There is still people out there who have spent 10k on the game, and got banned for sharing/unintentional/intentional mistake that was little, just like the smiley example I given. While I am thankful for current way game deals with these it yet stands morally unfair, while in general manner they're even less harmful than duplicating gold bug, and for that I do think older players have also same right to appeal

It was well-detailed answer thank you.
 
While I agree and understand it mostly, it still is quite unfair to the players earlier, I am more than happy times are also changing to player-friendly with no that much of aware to lose account that have been built for years, but.. There is still people out there who have spent 10k on the game, and got banned for sharing/unintentional/intentional mistake that was little, just like the smiley example I given. While I am thankful for current way game deals with these it yet stands morally unfair, while in general manner they're even less harmful than duplicating gold bug, and for that I do think older players have also same right to appeal

It was well-detailed answer thank you.
 
While I agree and understand it mostly, it still is quite unfair to the players earlier, I am more than happy times are also changing to player-friendly with no that much of aware to lose account that have been built for years, but.. There is still people out there who have spent 10k on the game, and got banned for sharing/unintentional/intentional mistake that was little, just like the smiley example I given. While I am thankful for current way game deals with these it yet stands morally unfair, while in general manner they're even less harmful than duplicating gold bug, and for that I do think older players have also same right to appeal

Each rule violation is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. We cannot comment on other users' violations, as this information is confidential.

I must stress that comparing punishments is incorrect, since their type and duration depend on multiple factors.

In any case, the final decision rests with Technical Support. If you have received a penalty, you can get detailed information by submitting a request at https://warspear-online.com/en/support.

Hi again,
I appreciate that different people—and even moderators—have varying perspectives on past incidents. However, I feel the need to respond to the type of message I recently received according the topic that was locked while the tone of it was yet respectful, and I got only answer:
While I understand the intent behind this response, I respectfully disagree with the idea that the passage of time invalidates the topic.
Let's be honest here: the system never “forgets” to unban players, no matter how long it’s been. Time doesn't erase penalties from past of the people, nor does it rewrite decisions made. So why should time be used to justify ignoring valid concerns about how those decisions were made in the first place? That kind of reasoning isn't professional, nor does it reflect transparency or consistency.
 
What I'm pointing out here isn’t about a personal grievance. It’s about fairness—and how the enforcement of rules appears to differ drastically depending on who breaks them and when.
As far as I know, the Terms of Service clearly prohibit exploiting glitches—yet when the gold duplication bug was used, many players walked away with light punishments or temporary restrictions. Meanwhile, older players were permanently banned for less severe actions like account sharing ie. —some of which are now regularly forgiven.
If rules are rules, then they should be applied consistently, not selectively based on timing, player volume, or server politics.
 
Here is also one example that really happened. Player x used glitch by mistake on previous year, he gained 1 extra smiley, and got permamently banned. Tell me, how this differs from the gold bug that got just forgiven and forgotten, or the against the players in the past who got banned from sharing?
 
 
 
I want to make it clear:
- I’m not here to blame or attack anyone, but rather seek answers in a constructive way.
- I am looking for answers how this was different from the past glitch or hack that really didnt lead to permament ban, while it is on the game conduct restricted, and doesn´t this decicion make it unfair to all older players for getting banned from similar or even less?
- And I believe here is right place to talk about it without having the topic shut down, you may correct me if it is not allowed, but I doubt there is any mistakes in a rules of conduct.
 
If locking these conversations is the response every time someone raises a tough but legitimate question, it just reinforces the idea that there is no real answer—and that the silence means I might be just right on this case.
 
So please: respond to the actual topic, not just shut it down with vague time-based dismissals. This community deserves more than that. Let's talk honestly about the situation and how similar actions have been handled so differently depending on when—and by whom—they were committed.
Thanks for reading, respectively waiting for your answers.

You said it yourself, rules are rules, they broke it as much as other people, and about rules, no rules been changed on this manner, the text has not been touched, and remained same for years to years according to the things that are forbidden and leads to permament ban, you may check it yourself from Image below.
 
 
It doesn't matter to the game, let's say someone abuses the bug and gifts gold to next person, it doesn't effect on the other person at all, as I remember ithanbr used to gift tons of signs to players before he got banned, and similar cases been happening and it only banned the abusers. So, it only means many used the bug.
 
Now, can someone more responsible with real answers reply on here than people with +1 post?
 
 

What I like about the Br-tourmaline server is the complete chaos, outrage, and controversies it generates. Even yesterday, if I'm not mistaken, the server went down several times. They've already confirmed it was a bug, which someone with bad intentions clearly exploited. Supposedly, they’ve fixed it, though I wouldn’t be surprised if it happens again and new controversies keep popping up, over and over again, as always 

You said it yourself, rules are rules, they broke it as much as other people, and about rules, no rules been changed on this manner, the text has not been touched, and remained same for years to years according to the things that are forbidden and leads to permament ban, you may check it yourself from Image below.
 
 
It doesn't matter to the game, let's say someone abuses the bug and gifts gold to next person, it doesn't effect on the other person at all, as I remember ithanbr used to gift tons of signs to players before he got banned, and similar cases been happening and it only banned the abusers. So, it only means many used the bug.
 
Now, can someone more responsible with real answers reply on here than people with +1 post?
 
 

Clearly they changed management, their posture when deciding everything has changed alot from old times for nowdays, i still expect they could review that, if actually doesnt exist perma ban anymore, should review the old ones, since the punishments have been already too much aggressive, and im sure people already have learn the lesson, if thats the case!

Hello Aigrind and dear community,
Let’s talk fairness—or, should I say, the selective memory of it.
 
As you see from the screenshot attachment, players on the BR-Tourmaline recently got caught using a gold duplication bug. Sounds serious, right? We're talking about something that literally broke the economy, skyrocketed item prices, and let people swim in duplicated gold like Scrooge McDuck. And what did they get?
 
Trade restrictions. For 7 days.
Followed by a one-month ban if caught clearly abusing it.
Yes, you heard it right. Not perma-banned. Not account-wiped. Just a slap on the wrist, a little vacation. Why? Well, according to the grapevine, it was too many players, so banning all of them would've nuked a nice slice of the server. Crystal-clear logic, aye? Equality at its finest.
 
Now, let's rewind to previous years. Some players were permanently banned just for sharing accounts. Yep. No bots. No gold duping. No server-crashing economy breaks. Just account sharing—something you now basically give a second chance for, no biggie. And don’t even get me started on bots—nowadays, they can almost write you a return letter themselves.
But try asking about those accounts that got ban on 2015-2018, You’ll get the robotic reply:
Oh really? Because you seem to revise your own rules just fine when more than dozens in the server’s involved using the bug.
Now, let me be clear. I’m here to ask:

Where’s the consistency?
Why were some people permabanned for similar or smaller violations, while others get spa weekends for economy-breaking exploits?
And don't even try the “we handle every case individually” line. That only applies when the “individuals” involved haven’t reached critical mass on a profitable server.
This post is to ask someone responsible from Aigrind to actually respond to this and answer:
 
Why are recent bot/gold bug exploiters treated more softly than people who shared an account or did similar back in last years? They dont have atleast the same rights?
Because right now, it looks like bans aren’t based on severity. They’re based on how many people broke the rules at once.
 
 
Cheers to balance.
Or whatever’s left of it.

Hello Aigrind and dear community,
Let’s talk fairness—or, should I say, the selective memory of it.
 
As you see from the screenshot attachment, players on the BR-Tourmaline recently got caught using a gold duplication bug. Sounds serious, right? We're talking about something that literally broke the economy, skyrocketed item prices, and let people swim in duplicated gold like Scrooge McDuck. And what did they get?
 
Trade restrictions. For 7 days.
Followed by a one-month ban if caught clearly abusing it.
Yes, you heard it right. Not perma-banned. Not account-wiped. Just a slap on the wrist, a little vacation. Why? Well, according to the grapevine, it was too many players, so banning all of them would've nuked a nice slice of the server. Crystal-clear logic, aye? Equality at its finest.
 
Now, let's rewind to previous years. Some players were permanently banned just for sharing accounts. Yep. No bots. No gold duping. No server-crashing economy breaks. Just account sharing—something you now basically give a second chance for, no biggie. And don’t even get me started on bots—nowadays, they can almost write you a return letter themselves.
But try asking about those accounts that got ban on 2015-2018, You’ll get the robotic reply:
Oh really? Because you seem to revise your own rules just fine when more than dozens in the server’s involved using the bug.
Now, let me be clear. I’m here to ask:

Where’s the consistency?
Why were some people permabanned for similar or smaller violations, while others get spa weekends for economy-breaking exploits?
And don't even try the “we handle every case individually” line. That only applies when the “individuals” involved haven’t reached critical mass on a profitable server.
This post is to ask someone responsible from Aigrind to actually respond to this and answer:
 
Why are recent bot/gold bug exploiters treated more softly than people who shared an account or did similar back in last years? They dont have atleast the same rights?
Because right now, it looks like bans aren’t based on severity. They’re based on how many people broke the rules at once.
 
 
Cheers to balance.
Or whatever’s left of it.

And the players on the brazilian server who previously used the gold bug, were not banned for a reason, that is, too many used the bug that it would have been too big ban hammer for the server, crystal-clear aye? equality at its finest, I would say, lol
 
And when it comes to 2015 players, they were permamently banned just from sharing account. While nowadays it is almost no-brainer to get account back from that, or using bots, same story. And when these 2015 players asking the accounts, they get the ol' good robotic reply "duration of bans in our game are not revised."
 
So, I am not here asking my accounts back since I quitted for this "equality" problem to exist, im not here for hear someone to say blah-blah-blahs, but rather interested hear someone responsible from aigrind to hear their view on this matter, why aren't you following your own rules that comes to botting and using gold bugs, while you banned other people from way smaller cases?

For ages people been wondering, why do mages go to spam life scrolls on flag. After playing mage, I see why it is so. I think this is most likely missing from the previous updates list, which removed all the AoE - effects to deal damage on objects - outcluding Shattered Stone. During wars, player have some milliseconds to use either HP pot or 1 skill, this is overall good, but mage is way above others on this, because they can simply just spam Shattered Stone -AoE skill, and as you can see, it's not on the list, altough it does significant AoE damage on objects. This is unfair to every other class, who need click on the flag, meanwhile mage can just go to near flag, and click the shattered stone and die, and do it all over again, without needing to actually "target" the flag as all the other classes have to. I hope @Nolan  you could have opinions for this as well, and sorry, I hate to bother
 
 

So, the new castle will be made of sand?

And who would win most likely if they have equal talents, the bookless warrior? You're funny 

And who would win most likely if they have equal talents, the bookless warrior? You're funny 

No. That's not how it works.
Lets say a seeker hits 2000 with normal hit. With 60% crit damage they would hit 5200 crits. With crit dmg book (70% crit dmg total) they would hit 5400. 3.8% increased damage compared to without book. 
Attack strength book gives 4% more damage.
Pene book gives 3% more damage.
And that's just the start. According to your logic every book should be useless because spending millions in books is unfair to those who don't spend that money.
Even studying all talents gives bigger damage boost than this op crit damage book you're talking about.

I'm sad too they didn't give new broken talent to seeker or reviving skill without ls to BD this time

I'm sad too they didn't give new broken talent to seeker or reviving skill without ls to BD this time

At least on paper Legion seem to have a big advantage in mass pvp related talents this time around. They are already winning all of them anyway so can't really say I'm looking forward to this.

So, the new castle will be made of sand?

So, the new castle will be made of sand?

Man, that would be so cool. 
 
A sand castle protected by a sand guardian. 

good idea, but such castles have their weaknesses
Anyway, the second part of the diaries will be soon...

dayumn bro great so great it's 110% nice costume and ideas.